Partnerships
in Promise
Throughout
history, the relationship between indigenous people of this continent
and the formal education system has been oppressive and demeaning. |
![]() |
| BIA schools are staffed
primarily by non-Native teachers who continue to present curriculum that
is inaccurate and filled with stereotypes. Native teachers within those
systems are many times perceived as adversarial when they
struggle to redesign curriculum to reflect a Native perspective. At the university level, many of the historical experts in the Native studies domains are non-Native and continue to define who is qualified to teach Native studies, based on criteria in which Native people have had little input or decision making. That is not to say there has not been some progress, particularly in the past two decades, as Native people have made as active effort to have more control over curriculum that relates to indigenous history and culture. There are more high school and college graduates from Native communities. There are more tribal colleges than ever before and in some areas of the country tribes, such as the Akwesasne Mohawks, have developed their own tribal primary and secondary schools. There is also the progressive and culturally based Chief Leschi School in Washington state. The number of tenured Native professors in universities has increased. In areas where tribal peoples have substantial numbers, there has been some increase awareness. But the struggle is far from over, and in most public schools on this continent, Native curriculum is a brief and usually inaccurate course of study that begins around Columbus Day and ends with Thanksgiving pageants with students dressed as colonists and Indians, complete with paper feathered head bands and Pilgrim hats. The focus generally remains on the idea that there used to be Indians. Imagine what would happen if they had access to the most updated computer technologies and could use these technologies as part of a true cultural exchange that could result in improved self-identity and self-esteem for all the students (and teachers) involved. Imagine what it would be like if mainstream schools and Native schools had access to an accurate, multi-media Native curriculum that would reach both Native and non-Native children with positive realities while they were young and at the peak of their learning time. |
| Imagine what it
would be like if mainstream schools and Native schools had access to an accurate, multi-media Native curriculum that would reach both Native and non-Native children with positive realities while they were young and at the peak of their learning time. |
![]() |
CradleboardA frame designed
for the benefit of children |
| These materials
have remained obscure and inaccessible to distant schoolrooms unless youre
a traveler in Indian Country. We put them in one place where teachers can get access to them. Were hoping to help teachers maximize their time. Our main goal is empowering children. Its not just about technology. We are not a tech project, although we believe in utilizing technology to help the children to communicate as they study Indian culture together. Not only Native American children, but non-Native children, too. |
![]() |
| When children
are small, they dont seem to have the problems getting along between
cultures like they do later in life. We have to realize that the power
of communities and of our ancient People that our Elders refer to hasnt
gone away. Its time we just sing our song together, with a very
joyful voice. The
Project is designed to run in two phases. In Phase I, Cradleboard will
provide a basic curriculum that looks at common-alities among Native
people. Areas such as: precolonial history, relationship with the federal
governments, geography, contributions to society, Native government,
social and cultural events, community life, and the word Indian
are addressed. |